What is your overall impression of the ABS challenge rule so far?
What is your favorite ABS challenge moment from a game you’ve played in?
Has knowing calls can be challenged impacted the approach of pitchers in general?
How has having challenges changed your approach as a catcher?
At the plate, how do you decide in the moment when to challenge/not challenge a close call
Three weeks into the 2026 MLB season, the introduction of the automated ball-strike challenge system has been the talk of baseball.
In the early days of the new ABS system, there have been nearly 1,000 calls challenged with 55% overturned — 47% of challenges initiated by the batter, 61% of fielder-initiated challenges. But even more so, the process that begins with a player tapping their helmet and ends with the umpire’s initial call either confirmed or overruled on the stadium videoboard has become a must-see moment across MLB ballparks and TV broadcasts.
Nico Hoerner, infielder, Chicago Cubs: It has felt clean. I don’t feel like it has made the games longer. We haven’t had one that’s been a huge turnaround in a game. I think it shows that umpires are mostly really good. There haven’t been many egregious calls.
Davis Martin, starting pitcher, Chicago White Sox: I think it’s just the consistency. I’ve had it since 2022 in the minor leagues, and so just being able to understand that you’re going to have the same strike zone every day. It’s really nice, some consistently you can work towards, and it’s not going to change from umpire to umpire.
And I didn’t realize how tough it is on those guys to kind of hear 30-plus thousand people know you maybe did your job wrong, I guess, on that pitch. So I guess that’s just something that I didn’t expect going in.
Rico Garcia, reliever, Baltimore Orioles: The fans seem to like it. They get loud when a call is overturned or is confirmed. It’s an interaction for them that they’ve never really had.
Jared Young, utility man, New York Mets: It doesn’t come up as much as people think. We’re not challenging every pitch. The umpires still do a very good job. It’s just the big ones that are maybe game swinging and at-bat swinging, you want them to get it right and this gives you the opportunity to change it. And if you don’t do it, it’s on you … so I feel like there’s no more complaining. It takes that out of it.
Paul Skenes, starting pitcher, Pittsburgh Pirates: It’s pretty cool. I don’t think it’s been super one-sided where the pitchers are getting a lot more than the hitters. It feels right so far.
Hoby Milner, reliever, Chicago Cubs: I would make it a three-dimensional plate. I don’t like it being one thin line. If we have the technology to do it on one line I have a feeling we can do it on the whole three-dimensional thing.
Mark Leiter Jr., reliever, Athletics: Maybe the starting pitcher gets one, maybe the bullpen gets one when they come in the game. Because I feel like, just my opinion, the way it’s built right now, I think it should really be used by hitters only.
I think there’s a couple of calls a game that they have a for sure understanding that wasn’t a strike. So, I think it’s a little easier for a hitter to use right now. As a pitcher, it’s really hard to see the zone sometimes, especially when your visual is how good the catchers are at receiving. So, sometimes it’s hard to see and you don’t want to be wrong.
Reese McGuire, catcher, Milwaukee Brewers: Maybe getting two on offense and two on defense per team. That could be a good tweak. And maybe more of the percentage of the baseball in the zone needs to be a strike, instead of a 1/10 of the ball. Maybe there is a better version of what’s a strike.
Skenes: The strike zone is the strike zone. A tenth of an inch inside the zone is still a strike. I wouldn’t change anything.
Gausman: I’ve heard talk that half the ball needs to be in the [box]. But I actually like where it’s at and I think as a fan, I think they actually enjoy the fact that it’s on the big screen.
I think the biggest issue we’re running into, is it going to be umpire discretion the whole time? Or are we going to have another clock that once the call is made, this clock starts and if you don’t do it by that time, you can’t get the challenge in. Anytime they make a rule change, you’re going to have some kind of weird time where everybody’s kind of trying to figure it out.
Paul Blackburn, reliever, New York Yankees: I do think it brings a little bit of quick excitement. Just a little thrill to it. I feel like the fans really enjoy it when you’re out there. And we do in the bullpen, too, when someone challenges it and we’ve done really well.
We’ve got a lot of them right. But I think it’s just another little bit of fan interaction, excitement that is brought. But I think it’s been good. You get rewarded for knowing the zone.
Garcia: I had a challenge confirmed for me in a big spot. But in that case I knew it was a strike. It was a 3-2 pitch with the bases loaded and two outs against Matt Wallner. It caught a lot of the plate. I knew the outcome there.
Jordan Leasure, reliever, Chicago White Sox: I don’t know if I have a favorite one, but I feel like that first week, whenever Q (catcher Edgar Quero) was 3-for-3 or whatever, it was like, all right, this is pretty cool.
McGuire: The ones that do stand out are the ones that turn a strike three into a ball or ball four into a strike. Those change the games.
Milner: I had a couple strike threes in spring training that they challenged. The whole ball was in the zone. They lost. That felt good.
Martin: I’ve gotten them wrong a lot in Triple-A, so I usually just let the catchers call them and trust the catchers to do what they need to do back there.
Blackburn: I’ll never challenge. They don’t necessarily say don’t challenge but basically trust our catchers. There’s so much going on for us out there. We release the ball and the catchers make it look so good that there’s plenty of times where you think like, ‘Man, I think that’s a strike’ and you look up and it’s not. So, just kind of trust those guys. But it hasn’t been like a ‘pitchers aren’t allowed to challenge’ thing.
Leiter: I don’t know if there’s any directive. I think it just makes more sense to not be the one. It’s kind of like when a hitter gets a front hip two-seamer and he’s not sure. He was moving. He didn’t swing because he froze. Those pitches are hard to challenge. It’s like any breaking ball that’s down is deceiving. You can see in and out a little bit, but the up and down is kind of an imaginary spot for eyesight. So it’s tough, on an emotional pitch, to make that call.
Garcia: I try not to deal with it because I’ll let the catcher have all the say. He has the better view of it.
Warren: I challenged one in spring. I think it’s that pitch that, for me, it’s probably like a backdoor sweeper or something that doesn’t get called that many times, but I throw it a lot. It’s going to be a pitch that I’ve thrown in the bullpen a million times and I’ve seen where it lands and that would be one that [I’d challenge]. But, for the most part, I’m just letting the catcher handle it.
Leasure: Maybe not as much for pitchers as it does for hitters. I feel like the hitters may be a little more patient. They kind of understand the top of the zone is different from what it used to be.
Martin: I think obviously there’s that 1/1000th of a second every time there’s a call strike three and a ball four to see if there’s going to be a challenge on both sides. And if there’s not, you just continue to move on and go to the next guy.
Garcia: I don’t think it will change my approach. I’ll get some overturned in my favor and some against me. That won’t change how I pitch.
Skenes: Nobody’s command is so good that they can adjust a tenth of an inch so I don’t think approaches will change based on the data or pitches being overturned.
Gausman: I don’t know if it has yet, but I think it will. What pitch is not a strike and now maybe that’s a strike. Those big breaking balls at top of the zone that actually clipped the zone, but maybe to a normal fan or even someone watching on TV, it looks too high. Once we know these things, it may change approach.
So that’s kind of one thing that I guess the book is still out on: What pitch is it going to be the most effective?
D’Arnaud: How is it different? [The strike zone] is eight inches further back. It’s not the front of the plate, it’s the middle of the plate. Now it’s based on height; it’s not based off your stance.
How I call pitches? I’m still figuring it out. I think the game’s going to move more toward east-west movement so they can get more strikes because four-seams up are now pretty much balls, and breaking balls that were at the front of the plate, or down below, now if they’re in the corner of the front of the plate, they’re a ball off. So I think it might translate more to front door, back door, try to just nip the corner. So I’m still trying to figure it out.
Rutschman: I think there is an understanding [with the umps] that I’m going to challenge some and there will be some overturned. We all make mistakes. It’s really tough. If the ball clips the zone, it’s a strike. Those are tough calls.
D’Arnaud: If it’s for sure, then I’ll do it. But obviously if you’re not sure and it’s early in the game, and you don’t want to lose your second one, for example — I think the first one’s a little more lax. But losing that second one early on a fringe call is a little more intense.
Rutschman: If you’re 100% confident it’s a ball and it was called a strike, then you do it. A 50/50 shot in a big situation, with runners on and stuff, that’s also worth it to be more risky.
Young: I think it’s got to be situation based. I feel like it’s got to be almost like a leverage thing, like ‘Am I going to first base? Or am I going to the dugout?’ I’ve kind of done that in the past.
That’s kind of been my thing because challenging a 1-0 pitch, or something like that, yeah, it changes the at-bat, but I think it’s more significant to have them in big spots of the game and you don’t know when that big spot’s going to be, but getting to first base is important.